Do these specialized areas of law require a more flexible approach to precedent?

(impermissibly) treated as binding “precedent.” Page 15. 7. 5. The Appellate Body wrongly claims that its reports are entitled to be treated as binding. Feb 4, 2017 ... The jurors determine the facts and reach a verdict, within the guidelines of the law as determined by the judge. The doctrine of precedent is the fundamental basis of the law applied by the judiciary, which specifies that a court should apply the rulings of previous cases. Mar 15, 2023 ... Binding precedent – Precedent that a court must abide by in its adjudication of a case. Persuasive precedent – Precedent that a court may ... Apr 30, 2020 ... Courts are bound by the past decisions of courts of the same level. So for example the Court of Appeal is bound to follow earlier decisions of ... Mar 26, 2016 ... A binding precedent is a ruling that must be followed because of the authority of the issuing court over the following court. May 16, 2018 ... As Conduragis and Britto show, Rhode Island employers have little definitive guidance to assist them in drafting enforceable arbitration ... of judges in the common law. 20 Michele Taruffo & Massimo La Torre, Precedent in Italy, in INTERPRETING. PRECEDENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY 131 (D ... Aug 9, 2022 ... Hence, the defining principle of common law is precedents, which is the requirement that judges must follow binding legal decisions of prior ... Under Rule 33(a) of the Georgia Court of Appeals, a decision by a three-judge panel is “physical precedent only” with respect to any part of the opinion in ...