What training or guidance is provided to editors on managing single blind review?

Jun 17, 2021 ... Conclusion. In this phase II study of two imetelstat doses, 9.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinical benefits in symptom response rate ... One hundred eighty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain randomly received either the AKA-H method (AKA-H group) or the sham technique (S group) ... Sep 18, 2019 ... Alternatively, in a “single-blind” review process, only the reviewers are anonymous to the authors. ... Most chemistry-related journals use a ... In single-blind review, reviewers' identities are blinded—that is, not known to authors—though authors' identities are revealed to reviewers at the time of ... But, according to Brown, the editors felt that trying to hide every single author identity would probably be unsuccessful, and authors too recognizable, to be ... Nov 25, 2013 ... It seemed logical to assume that in single blind peer-review, the reviewer should not disclose his identity without the editor's consent. IEEE-HPEC paper reviews are to be conducted in a single-blind manner. That is, the reviewers remain anonymous, while the paper author list and author ... Single anonymized review · Knowledge of the author may overshadow the quality of the work, potentially leading to a lack of scrutiny, especially if it's the work ... Efficacy and Safety of CBL-514 Injection in Reducing Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study. Michael Gold, MD ... Jan 17, 2025 ... ... single-blind feasibility study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05974072). It included 41 participants that were randomly allocated to either the ...