Are there alternative ways to evaluate research quality besides traditional peer review?

... study was single blind (expert cytopathologist) and naïve Paris system for urine cytology assessment was used. Furthermore, additional cytological ... Jun 20, 2019 ... In a single-blind review, the reviewers (or referees) know whose manuscript they are reviewing, but the names of the reviewers are kept secret ... Jun 25, 2021 ... A single-blind randomised non-inferiority trial comparing heterologous and homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 ... Dec 18, 2016 ... Double-blind means that reviewer names are hidden from authors, and author names are hidden from reviewers. · Single-blind (a.k.a. “blind”) means ... Aug 13, 2024 ... A review of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of conservative interventions for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. ... single-blind study. BMC ... Jul 17, 2023 ... Single-, double-, and triple-blinding are commonly used blinding strategies in clinical research. A single-blind study masks the subjects ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... Nov 1, 2020 ... Single-blind review just increases the chance of having reviewers biased racially, religiously, or academically (junior researchers fighting ... May 21, 2017 ... What is a single blind or double blind peer review? In a single-blind review, the author does not know who the reviewer(s) is/are, but the ... Apr 27, 2022 ... Study design and participants. This parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted in patients who had been referred ...