What are the ethical considerations of using AI in peer review?

May 12, 2022 ... The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of administration of the combination of midazolam and pethidine during bronchoscopy. Nov 1, 2020 ... Single-blind review just increases the chance of having reviewers biased racially, religiously, or academically (junior researchers fighting ... The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a ... All manuscripts submitted to the American Economic Review undergo single-blind peer review—the name of the author is revealed to the referee(s) ... Dec 13, 2021 ... Microneedling followed by 5-fluorouracil application showed better response than needling alone with minimal side effects and the results were ... Efficacy and Safety of CBL-514 Injection in Reducing Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study. Michael Gold, MD ... ... Study protocol of a randomized multicenter, single-blind trial. Registry ... Institutional Approvals: Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee ... May 16, 2022 ... Ureteral stent materials remain prone to encrustation induced by urine exposure and its contents (ie, ions, microbial biofilm), resulting in accelerated ... ... reviewed via a double-blind review process. Demo papers must be accompanied by a conference demonstration (see details below), and can be reviewed via a single ... Peer review may be “single-blind,” in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or “double-blind,” in which this information ...