How can authors identify journals that have rigorous and fair single blind review processes?

... study was single blind (expert cytopathologist) and naïve Paris system for urine cytology assessment was used. Furthermore, additional cytological ... Feb 13, 2013 ... Double-blind reviews imply that both the author and the reviewers are blind, while single-blind reviews imply that reviewers are blind and the author is not. They randomly assign each of the 113 reviewers to give either single- or double- blind reviews, and each paper submission receives at least three single-blind ... Oct 12, 2021 ... (2017) designed a similar experiment where papers submitted to a reputable computer science conference were subjected to both single-blind and ... Mar 24, 2021 ... We evaluate the emission detection and quantification capabilities of Kairos Aerospace's airplane-based hyperspectral imaging methane emission detection system. But, according to Brown, the editors felt that trying to hide every single author identity would probably be unsuccessful, and authors too recognizable, to be ... A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ... Jan 8, 2016 ... Conclusion. Chitosan from fungal origin was able to reduce the mean body weight up to 3 kg during the 90 day study period. Together with this, ... Mar 24, 2021 ... To assess whether the type of peer-review (single-blinded vs double-blinded) has an impact on nationality representation in journals. Apr 14, 2022 ... The double-blind peer review process seemed to be associated with an 18% lower manuscript acceptance rate than the single-blind peer review process.