How can authors advocate for their work while respecting the integrity of the peer review process?

... study was single blind (expert cytopathologist) and naïve Paris system for urine cytology assessment was used. Furthermore, additional cytological ... Blank, Rebecca M, 1991. "The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review," American Economic ... Jun 20, 2024 ... Comparing Single-Blind and Double-Blind Approaches. When it comes to mitigating bias, double-blind peer review generally performs better than ... Aug 26, 2020 ... Single-blind peer review. This is where reviewers know the identity of authors, but authors do not know the identity of reviewers. It is an ... Sep 22, 2020 ... Differences between Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review. In single-blind peer review, only the reviewers are anonymous. Reviewers know the ... This blinded prospective assessment demonstrates that unilateral GKT is a safe and efficient procedure for severe medically refractory tremor. ... blind reviewing procedure, the Editorial Board was asked for its recommendation. Roughly a third favored retaining single-blind reviewing (SBR), roughly a ... Debate continues regarding the merits of single-blind review, in which anonymous reviewers know the authors of a paper and their affiliations, compared with ... A second objective was to compare open peer review with single-blind peer review. This study was the first to analyse a large number of reviewer reports ... Apr 14, 2022 ... The double-blind peer review process seemed to be associated with an 18% lower manuscript acceptance rate than the single-blind peer review process.