Is the code's deployment process well-defined?

Jan 25, 2016 ... In the book you'll find the series of tips from Trisha Gee on what to look for when doing code reviews, including aspects of testing, security, ... Sep 10, 2020 ... This advice is not only for more experienced programmers who check the code of their junior colleagues and want to write something motivating. Jan 9, 2023 ... A good code review is thorough, constructive, and efficient and can significantly improve the quality of the codebase and the overall development process. After a software developer has completed coding, a code review is an important step in the software development process to get a second opinion on the ... Jul 22, 2024 ... In this article, we'll discuss the importance of code reviews and guide you through creating a thorough checklist to streamline the review process. Mar 10, 2021 ... Here is an excellent resource on code reviews by Angie Jones. It is NOT about low level coding details like “use descriptive names for your variables” or such. Jan 5, 2011 ... If I do see something that looks wrong, I explain my opinion and I explain how I would address it in one of the languages I know. Sometimes my ... Summary · The code is well-designed. · The functionality is good for the users of the code. · Any UI changes are sensible and look good. · Any parallel ... Jan 13, 2018 ... The first step to reviewing code in the terminal is to check out the code in the first place. One option is to simply to git pull and then git checkout

Find similar items here:

what to look for in a code review

• Are there any security tests? Does the code handle API versioning correctly?
• Does the review process help to improve the overall architecture and design of the system? Does the code handle microservices communication correctly (if applicable)?
• Is the code's README clear and informative?
• Are the integration tests reliable? Does the code handle stream processing correctly?
• Is there a mechanism for escalating unresolved review issues? Does the code handle authentication mechanisms securely?
• Is the code review tool user-friendly and efficient? Does the code handle idempotency correctly in APIs?
• Is the code review process seen as a learning opportunity for all involved? Does the code handle idempotency in distributed systems?
• Are there any potential issues with CORS configuration?
• Are there any potential issues with logging configurations?
• Are there any potential issues with caching mechanisms?