What are the ethical challenges of addressing misinformation and disinformation online?

When the conclusion expresses what ought to be, based only on what is, or what ought not to be, based on what is not. This is very common. A naturalistic fallacy is an argument that concludes that because an outcome or action is influenced by nature, then it must be good. One example of a ... Mar 25, 2022 ... Social Sciences · Psychology · Psychology questions and answers · According to G. E. Moore, the naturalistic fallacy holds: (pick all that apply) ... “I have no intention to commit what is often called the genetic or naturalistic fallacy,”. F. A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit, p. 27. In his paper titled “Did Hayek ... Abstract. David Hume famously argued that we cannot logically move from sentences about how the world is, to sentences about how it ought to be. Doing so has ... The Naturalistic Fallacy rules out any attempt to treat morality as defined according to some pre-existent reality. 1 - The Naturalistic Fallacy and the History of Metaethics pp 9-29 Access 2 - The Naturalistic Fallacy: What It Is, and What It Isn't pp 30-53 Access May 2, 2013 ... This book describes the "naturalistic fallacy", as attributed to Hume, that non-moral premises cannot logically entail a moral conclusion, ... Abstract. The naturalistic fallacy appears to be ubiquitous and irresistible. The avant-garde and the rearguard, the devout and the secular, the learned elite ... This paper reviews several versions of the fallacy, and demonstrates that none of them present an obstacle to this updated, evolutionary version of Humean ...