What are some potential sources of moral knowledge or justification?

no-one seems to have drawn attention to some very explicit utter- ances by Mill to the effect that ' ought '-statements were of a differ-. Certain scholars wish to acquit St. Thomas Aquinas of the “illicit inference from facts to norms” commonly referred to as the naturalistic fallacy. Seeing in ... Assuming that something that is natural is “right” or “good” is referred to as “the naturalistic fallacy”. ... naturalistic fallacy is. I emphasize that for Moore naturalism in ethics included not only the scientific naturalism of Mill and Spencer, but also the ... Week Two (September 11th and 13th): The Naturalistic Fallacy. Required Readings: Moore, Principia Ethica, §§ 1-17. Frankena, “The Naturalistic Fallacy”. Week ... Jan 15, 2008 ... In response to the proposal justifying the morality of homosexual acts offered by Todd A. Salzman and Michael G. Lawler, this paper seeks to ... Apr 21, 2025 ... Moral judgments are objective in the sense that they are true or false independently of the feelings or beliefs of the individual. Nov 23, 2012 ... ... naturalist ethic without committing the naturalistic fallacy. ... Fallacy, Rational Choice, G. E. Moore, Moral Internalism, Naturalism ... 1 - The Naturalistic Fallacy and the History of Metaethics pp 9-29 Access 2 - The Naturalistic Fallacy: What It Is, and What It Isn't pp 30-53 Access Feb 7, 2011 ... I've just been told that to make a value judgment based on facts (or to derive an "ought" from an "is") is a naturalistic fallacy.