What are different philosophical perspectives on the relationship between religion and morality?

Jan 7, 2016 ... Yes, one can argue that the inference of "rights" from "nature" is not empirically valid, and in logic would appear not as a fallacy per se, but as a dubious ... The naturalistic fallacy is mentioned frequently by evolutionary psychologists as an erroneous way of thinking about the ethical implications of evolved ... 1 - The Naturalistic Fallacy and the History of Metaethics pp 9-29 Access 2 - The Naturalistic Fallacy: What It Is, and What It Isn't pp 30-53 Access Pre-title sequence: naturalistic fallacy. 2. A niche concept focusing on niche specificity. 3. Darwinian evolutionary theory. Feminist critics of evolutionary psychology are often accused of committing the naturalistic fallacy, that is, of inferring certain normative conclusions ... Indeed, anyone who reasons in this way is guilty of the naturalistic fallacy. I conclude by saying that properly conceptualized, empirical research and ... Many 'natural' things are also considered 'good', and this can bias our thinking; but naturalness itself doesn't make something good or bad. For instance murder ... Apr 21, 2025 ... Moral judgments are objective in the sense that they are true or false independently of the feelings or beliefs of the individual. The naturalistic fallacy is an alleged error in ethics, not in logic. Defining "good" as what is natural is, at most, an instance of the naturalistic fallacy. Abstract. David Hume famously argued that we cannot logically move from sentences about how the world is, to sentences about how it ought to be. Doing so has ...