How should we balance the needs of human development with the preservation of natural habitats?

Jan 7, 2016 ... Yes, one can argue that the inference of "rights" from "nature" is not empirically valid, and in logic would appear not as a fallacy per se, but as a dubious ... fallacy, and to indicate where the issue really lies. The prominence of the concept of a naturalistic fallacy in recent moral philosophy is another testimony to ... A naturalistic fallacy is an argument that concludes that because an outcome or action is influenced by nature, then it must be good. One example of a ... > Moore's naturalistic fallacy > Quine's attack > contingent identities ? > Kripke's refinement > Identification and scientific reduction > Ontology is not ... When the conclusion expresses what ought to be, based only on what is, or what ought not to be, based on what is not. This is very common. ... naturalistic fallacy, donor profiles, public communication, and reversibility. ... naturalistic fallacy'. The fallacy, also known as the “is-ought problem ... “I have no intention to commit what is often called the genetic or naturalistic fallacy,”. F. A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit, p. 27. In his paper titled “Did Hayek ... Apr 19, 2014 ... The naturalistic fallacy is to explain what is good in terms of something that is inherent or natural and has no moral/ethical quality. An ... Week Two (September 11th and 13th): The Naturalistic Fallacy. Required Readings: Moore, Principia Ethica, §§ 1-17. Frankena, “The Naturalistic Fallacy”. Week ... arguing against naturalistic and metaphysical theories. 11. Moore does not yet define naturalism, but it is clear from context that naturalists are defining.