How does the naturalistic fallacy relate to discussions about the moral status of artificial intelligence?

When the conclusion expresses what ought to be, based only on what is, or what ought not to be, based on what is not. This is very common. G.E. Moore: Principia Ethica. The naturalistic fallacy. Moore's book begins with criticisms of ethical naturalism (specifically utilitarian naturalism). He ... An appeal to nature is a logical fallacy that occurs when something is assumed to be good because it is "natural" or bad because it is "unnatural". Mar 17, 2023 ... Community Answer ... The argument that commits the naturalistic fallacy is the one that states 'we should not eat meat because humans are designed ... The naturalistic fallacy is when we think the way things are in nature or have been historically is the way they should be for us. Pre-title sequence: naturalistic fallacy. 2. A niche concept focusing on niche specificity. 3. Darwinian evolutionary theory. Feb 23, 2021 ... The wine world's naturalistic fallacy is the notion that wine itself is immanent, existing in some sort of idealized state independent of actual wine ... Mar 18, 2015 ... Common to any normatively plausible exposition of the social determinants of health is avoidance of the naturalistic fallacy. That is, ethical ... Apr 19, 2014 ... The naturalistic fallacy is to explain what is good in terms of something that is inherent or natural and has no moral/ethical quality. An ... The naturalistic fallacy (NF) refers to "is-ought" confusions in which empirical descriptions of nature are seen as dictating moral conclusions.