How does the naturalistic fallacy relate to debates about criminal justice?

The Naturalistic Fallacy is based on the mistaken notion that you can deduce moral lessons from observing nature... that is, what is natural is morally good. - ... 1 - The Naturalistic Fallacy and the History of Metaethics pp 9-29 Access 2 - The Naturalistic Fallacy: What It Is, and What It Isn't pp 30-53 Access The naturalistic fallacy (NF) refers to "is-ought" confusions in which empirical descriptions of nature are seen as dictating moral conclusions. ... Naturalistic Fallacy'. This fallacy – which has been variously understood, but has almost always been seen as something to avoid – was perhaps the greatest ... Feb 23, 2021 ... The wine world's naturalistic fallacy is the notion that wine itself is immanent, existing in some sort of idealized state independent of actual wine ... Mar 17, 2023 ... Community Answer ... The argument that commits the naturalistic fallacy is the one that states 'we should not eat meat because humans are designed ... Many 'natural' things are also considered 'good', and this can bias our thinking; but naturalness itself doesn't make something good or bad. For instance murder ... This view I propose to call the “naturalistic fallacy.” ( Moore, 1978, p. 10). According to Moore, it is fallacious to define goodness in terms of natural ... Jun 24, 2024 ... Naturalistic fallacy example “Humans have always engaged in competing for resources, and taking a selfish approach helps ensure survival. The naturalistic fallacy is when we think the way things are in nature or have been historically is the way they should be for us.