How can we ensure that algorithms are fair, transparent, and accountable?

Apr 21, 2025 ... Moral judgments are objective in the sense that they are true or false independently of the feelings or beliefs of the individual. When the conclusion expresses what ought to be, based only on what is, or what ought not to be, based on what is not. This is very common. The Naturalistic Fallacy and Theological Ethics.Christian B. Miller - 2018 - In Neil Sinclair, The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University ... Abstract: According to the conventional interpretation of Hume's celebrated passage in the Treatise on “is” and “ought”, no set of nonmoral premises, ... Mar 18, 2015 ... Common to any normatively plausible exposition of the social determinants of health is avoidance of the naturalistic fallacy. That is, ethical ... ... Naturalistic Fallacy'. This fallacy – which has been variously understood, but has almost always been seen as something to avoid – was perhaps the greatest ... Abstract. The naturalistic fallacy appears to be ubiquitous and irresistible. The avant-garde and the rearguard, the devout and the secular, the learned elite ... Certain scholars wish to acquit St. Thomas Aquinas of the “illicit inference from facts to norms” commonly referred to as the naturalistic fallacy. Seeing in ... ... naturalistic fallacy is. I emphasize that for Moore naturalism in ethics included not only the scientific naturalism of Mill and Spencer, but also the ... arguing against naturalistic and metaphysical theories. 11. Moore does not yet define naturalism, but it is clear from context that naturalists are defining.