How can philosophers contribute to public discourse and policy-making on science and technology?

... naturalistic fallacy valid as a matter of logic. The three systems he investigates are, the Standard Deontic logic, a Relevant Deontic logic, and Schotch ... Assuming that something that is natural is “right” or “good” is referred to as “the naturalistic fallacy”. Indeed, anyone who reasons in this way is guilty of the naturalistic fallacy. I conclude by saying that properly conceptualized, empirical research and ... Mar 17, 2023 ... Community Answer ... The argument that commits the naturalistic fallacy is the one that states 'we should not eat meat because humans are designed ... ... naturalism was simply a mistake. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, some moral philosophers began losing their fear of the naturalistic fallacy and ... Apr 21, 2025 ... Moral judgments are objective in the sense that they are true or false independently of the feelings or beliefs of the individual. Nov 23, 2012 ... ... naturalist ethic without committing the naturalistic fallacy. ... Fallacy, Rational Choice, G. E. Moore, Moral Internalism, Naturalism ... Jan 7, 2016 ... Yes, one can argue that the inference of "rights" from "nature" is not empirically valid, and in logic would appear not as a fallacy per se, but as a dubious ... Mar 15, 2016 ... The naturalistic fallacy is an informal logical fallacy which argues that if something is 'natural' it must be good. It is closely related to ... G.E. Moore: Principia Ethica. The naturalistic fallacy. Moore's book begins with criticisms of ethical naturalism (specifically utilitarian naturalism). He ...