Can reason provide a bridge between "is" and "ought"?

The Naturalistic Fallacy rules out any attempt to treat morality as defined according to some pre-existent reality. The Naturalistic Fallacy and Theological Ethics.Christian B. Miller - 2018 - In Neil Sinclair, The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University ... ... naturalistic fallacy is. I emphasize that for Moore naturalism in ethics included not only the scientific naturalism of Mill and Spencer, but also the ... This paper reviews several versions of the fallacy, and demonstrates that none of them present an obstacle to this updated, evolutionary version of Humean ... Assuming that something that is natural is “right” or “good” is referred to as “the naturalistic fallacy”. May 27, 2014 ... ... naturalistic fallacy, is/ought inferences, epistemic “oughts,” deontic “oughts,” defeasible reasoning, deontic reasoning. When scholars ... Apr 2, 2020 ... ... naturalistic ethics. Naturalistic ethics has a problem of "naturalistic fallacy", and normative ethics also has a problem of "normative ... Feb 23, 2021 ... The wine world's naturalistic fallacy is the notion that wine itself is immanent, existing in some sort of idealized state independent of actual wine ... The naturalistic fallacy is mentioned frequently by evolutionary psychologists as an erroneous way of thinking about the ethical implications of evolved ... Many 'natural' things are also considered 'good', and this can bias our thinking; but naturalness itself doesn't make something good or bad. For instance murder ...