How do you interpret the findings of your narrative review in the context of the existing literature?

15 This narrative review was undertaken for the dual purpose of (1) assessing current evidence concerning caffeine-related pregnancy outcomes, and (2) ... We identified 28 cases of proven/probable cryptococcosis occurring in patients receiving BTKis, almost exclusively with ibrutinib. Both systematic and narrative reviews are classified as secondary research studies since they both use existing primary research studies eg case studies. Jan 16, 2025 ... How to Begin? · Read your sources carefully and find the main idea(s) of each source · Look for similarities in your sources – which sources are ... It takes an average of 88 hours for a systematic review team to extract data from · Make sure you have collected the full text of any included articles. Jan 15, 2020 ... A literature review is not an annotated bibliography. Your goal should be to go one step further and integrate and synthesize what you find in ... Dec 4, 2023 ... Narrative reviews are not as comprehensive as systematic reviews or other types of knowledge syntheses. They are generally conducted by experts ... Biliary duct dilatation is a common finding in clinical practice and is often incidental. In the absence of clinical symptoms or elevated levels on liver ... Systematic review and evidence synthesis. Librarians partner with researchers to conduct evidence syntheses. These are syntheses of all previously conducted ... Mar 26, 2019 ... SANRA's feasibility, inter-rater reliability, homogeneity of items, and internal consistency are sufficient for a scale of six items.