What are the potential consequences of perceived unfairness in the review process?

Nov 21, 2022 ... Study Design and Participants. The study was a single-blind, 3-arm randomized controlled trial performed at a university in Tianjin, China. Jul 6, 2022 ... Although single-blind peer reviews are the most popular form of peer review, double-blind peer reviews are arguably better. Dec 13, 2021 ... Microneedling followed by 5-fluorouracil application showed better response than needling alone with minimal side effects and the results were ... Dec 7, 2018 ... pylori infection. Methods. Study population. A placebo-controlled, single-blind study of Pylopass™ containing L. reuteri ... Sep 18, 2020 ... But critics of single-blind review say that this knowledge can also negatively bias a reviewer, who may disfavor lesser-known researchers ... Feb 18, 2015 ... Since June 2013, Nature Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have allowed authors to choose between double-blind and single-blind peer review at ... TIE - Single-Blind review process ... Submission policy has changed on 01 July 2020. TIE has switched to "single-blind" peer review process, where the identities ... In single-anonymous, the names of the reviewers are not shared with the author, but the reviewers are aware of the author's identity. In double-anonymous, ... Single-blind review: Authors identities are revealed to all, but reviewer identities are not revealed to authors (also known as anonymous review); Open review: ... All manuscripts submitted to the American Economic Review undergo single-blind peer review—the name of the author is revealed to the referee(s) ...