Can You Own Two Football Clubs? Understanding Multi-Club Ownership Rules

Owning multiple football clubs is a complex issue. Confused about the rules surrounding multi-club ownership? CAUHOI2025.UK.COM breaks down the regulations, UEFA’s stance, and the potential challenges and motivations behind owning more than one football club, especially concerning U.S. fans. Discover the truth about football club ownership, ownership regulations, and sports investment strategies.

1. Understanding Multi-Club Ownership in Football

The question of whether you can own two football clubs is not straightforward. While owning two clubs within the same country often faces restrictions, owning clubs in different countries is a more nuanced issue. Let’s delve into the regulations, motivations, and challenges surrounding multi-club ownership in football.

1.1. Restrictions on Owning Multiple Clubs in the Same Country

Generally, football club owners are not permitted to own another club in the same country to preserve fairness and prevent conflicts of interest. For instance, in England and Italy, strict rules prevent individuals from owning multiple clubs, even those playing in different divisions. Italy implemented a similar ban in 2021, and the rules apply to clubs that do not play in the same division and minority shareholdings. According to Gabriele Gavrina, the president of the FIGC, no participation or absolute control of the company will be permitted.

1.2. The Multi-Club Ownership Model

Despite the restrictions within single countries, the multi-club ownership model is gaining traction. This model involves owning clubs in different countries, circumventing national regulations. A 2021 study by Play The Game revealed that 15 English clubs were part of a multi-club system, the most of any country in Europe. Notable examples include City Football Group and Red Bull, which own clubs across various continents.

1.3. Current Rules in England Regarding Football Club Ownership

In England, potential owners and directors must pass the Owners & Directors Test, which assesses their suitability to run a club. Individuals with a shareholding exceeding 30% in another club are typically ineligible. Additionally, owners or directors cannot exert influence over the management of another club.

2. UEFA’s Position on Multi-Club Ownership

UEFA has historically opposed multi-club ownership due to concerns about integrity and potential conflicts of interest.

2.1. UEFA’s Regulations and Investigations

In 1998, UEFA launched an investigation into multi-club ownership involving AEK Athens and Slavia Prague, both having the same majority shareholders and qualifying for the UEFA Cup. The matter was brought before the Court of Arbitration of Sport (CAS) in 1999, leading to a rule that banned two clubs with the same majority shareholders from playing each other in the same European competition.

2.2. UEFA’s Definition of Ownership

UEFA’s integrity rules allow for one person or company to have a 100% shareholding in one club and a ‘non-decisive influence’ shareholding in another competing in the same competition, without violating the rules. The stipulation concerning ‘decisive influence’ was not initially part of the UEFA rules but was later added to ensure there was a catch-all provision to prevent common ownership under the 50.1% threshold.

2.3. Reasons for UEFA’s Opposition

UEFA’s primary concern is that multi-club ownership can create a conflict of interest. This can lead to one club becoming a feeder to another, potentially tempering the ambitions of the smaller club.

3. Challenges and Motivations Behind Multi-Club Ownership

While multi-club ownership presents challenges, it also offers potential benefits for owners and clubs.

3.1. Challenges Associated with Multi-Club Ownership

Running multiple clubs involves navigating different jurisdictions, managing varied fan expectations, and handling the financial burdens of loss-making clubs. Additionally, feeder clubs may face unpopularity among supporters.

3.2. Motivations for Owning Multiple Football Clubs

Owners may choose to run multiple football clubs for several reasons, including diversifying their business portfolio, reducing financial risk, expanding their brand, and facilitating player movements between clubs. Some also engage in sportswashing, seeking global exposure through football investments.

3.3. Financial Risks and Rewards

While owning multiple clubs can provide financial diversification, it also carries the risk of significant losses. Overseas investors withdrawing from clubs, as seen in Denmark with Naestved and Vendsyssel, can plunge clubs into crisis. An owner with a large portfolio might view underperforming clubs as disposable.

4. The Future of Multi-Club Ownership

The future of multi-club ownership remains uncertain. UEFA and major European leagues are currently resistant to the idea, and regulations may become more restrictive.

4.1. Potential Acceptance by the Ultra-Wealthy

Despite its growing popularity, the likelihood of multi-club ownership becoming widely accepted is low. UEFA and most major European leagues are currently resistant to the idea, and it’s possible that the rules may become more restrictive rather than less so.

4.2. Rules and Regulations

Existing rules are designed to prevent conflicts of interest and maintain the integrity of the game. These regulations aim to ensure that no single entity has undue influence over multiple clubs in a way that could distort competition.

4.3. Likely Scenarios

It is even possible that the rules may become more restrictive rather than less so. Furthermore, the notion of football being entirely controlled by a small number of corporations with many different brands seems unlikely.

5. The Impact on Smaller Clubs

One of the most significant concerns surrounding multi-club ownership is its potential impact on smaller clubs.

5.1. Feeder Club Status

Smaller clubs run the risk of becoming feeder clubs, with their ambitions potentially limited by their owners’ priorities. This can stifle their growth and reduce their competitiveness.

5.2. Financial Dependence

Smaller clubs may become overly reliant on their owners, making them vulnerable if the owners decide to withdraw their support. The instability can lead to financial difficulties and even collapse.

5.3. Fan Sentiment

Supporters may resent their club becoming a feeder club, leading to decreased attendance and a loss of local identity. This can create a toxic environment that undermines the club’s long-term prospects.

6. Notable Examples of Multi-Club Ownership

Examining specific examples of multi-club ownership can provide valuable insights into the potential benefits and drawbacks of this model.

6.1. City Football Group

City Football Group (CFG) is one of the most prominent examples of multi-club ownership. CFG owns or has stakes in clubs across the globe, including Manchester City, New York City FC, and Melbourne City FC.

6.2. Red Bull

Red Bull is another well-known example, owning clubs such as RB Leipzig, Red Bull Salzburg, and New York Red Bulls. Red Bull’s approach focuses on developing young talent and promoting a consistent brand identity across its clubs.

6.3. Other Emerging Groups

Several other groups are also adopting the multi-club ownership model, including those based in the United States and Asia. These groups see multi-club ownership as a way to expand their global presence and tap into new markets.

7. The Role of Financial Fair Play

Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations play a crucial role in governing multi-club ownership.

7.1. Preventing Financial Imbalances

FFP regulations aim to prevent clubs from spending beyond their means and creating unsustainable financial imbalances. These regulations can affect multi-club owners by limiting their ability to inject unlimited funds into their clubs.

7.2. Scrutiny of Related Party Transactions

FFP regulations also scrutinize related-party transactions, where clubs conduct business with entities linked to their owners. These transactions can be used to circumvent FFP rules, but they are subject to close examination by regulatory bodies.

7.3. Impact on Investment Strategies

FFP regulations can influence the investment strategies of multi-club owners, encouraging them to focus on sustainable growth and revenue generation. This can lead to a greater emphasis on developing young talent and creating long-term value.

8. The Legal and Regulatory Landscape

The legal and regulatory landscape surrounding multi-club ownership is constantly evolving.

8.1. Varying National Regulations

National regulations regarding club ownership vary widely, with some countries imposing stricter rules than others. This patchwork of regulations can create challenges for multi-club owners seeking to expand their portfolios.

8.2. UEFA and FIFA Regulations

UEFA and FIFA also have regulations that govern club ownership, particularly in relation to competition integrity. These regulations aim to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure fair play.

8.3. Future Regulatory Changes

Future regulatory changes could significantly impact multi-club ownership. There is growing pressure on regulatory bodies to tighten the rules and address the potential risks associated with this model.

9. Fan Perspectives on Multi-Club Ownership

Fan perspectives on multi-club ownership are diverse and often depend on the specific circumstances of each club.

9.1. Concerns About Identity and Autonomy

Some fans worry that multi-club ownership could erode their club’s unique identity and autonomy. They fear that their club could become a mere extension of a larger corporate entity.

9.2. Appreciation for Financial Stability

Other fans appreciate the financial stability that multi-club ownership can bring. They recognize that their club may not have survived without the support of a wealthy owner.

9.3. Divided Loyalties

Multi-club ownership can also create divided loyalties, with some fans struggling to reconcile their love for their club with their concerns about the broader implications of this model.

10. Economic Implications for Football

Multi-club ownership has significant economic implications for football, both positive and negative.

10.1. Increased Investment

Multi-club ownership can lead to increased investment in football, particularly in developing countries. This investment can help to improve infrastructure, develop young talent, and grow the sport.

10.2. Concentration of Power

However, multi-club ownership can also lead to a concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals or groups. This can distort competition and reduce the diversity of ownership in football.

10.3. Globalisation of Football

Multi-club ownership is part of the broader globalisation of football, with clubs increasingly owned by international investors and players moving between leagues more frequently. This trend is reshaping the economics of football and creating new opportunities and challenges.

11. Potential Benefits for Smaller Clubs

Despite the concerns, multi-club ownership can offer potential benefits for smaller clubs.

11.1. Access to Resources and Expertise

Smaller clubs can gain access to resources and expertise that they would not otherwise have. This can help them to improve their operations, develop their players, and grow their fan base.

11.2. Player Development

Multi-club ownership can facilitate player development, with young players given opportunities to play at different levels and in different leagues. This can accelerate their development and increase their chances of success.

11.3. Increased Exposure

Smaller clubs can gain increased exposure through multi-club ownership, with their matches broadcast to a wider audience and their players attracting more attention from scouts.

12. Risks for Larger Clubs

While multi-club ownership can benefit smaller clubs, it also carries risks for larger clubs.

12.1. Reputational Damage

Larger clubs could suffer reputational damage if their smaller clubs are perceived to be exploited or mistreated. This could harm their brand and alienate their fans.

12.2. Financial Strain

Larger clubs could face financial strain if their smaller clubs are consistently losing money. This could limit their ability to invest in their own teams and compete at the highest level.

12.3. Distraction From Core Objectives

Managing multiple clubs can distract larger clubs from their core objectives, such as winning championships and competing in European competitions. This could undermine their success and disappoint their fans.

13. Case Studies of Successful and Unsuccessful Models

Examining case studies of successful and unsuccessful multi-club ownership models can provide valuable lessons for potential investors.

13.1. The City Football Group Model

The City Football Group model is often cited as a successful example of multi-club ownership. CFG has invested heavily in its clubs and has achieved success both on and off the field.

13.2. The Red Bull Model

The Red Bull model is another successful example, with its clubs consistently competing at the highest level and developing young talent.

13.3. Unsuccessful Examples

There have also been unsuccessful examples of multi-club ownership, where clubs have struggled financially or have failed to achieve their objectives. These examples highlight the risks associated with this model and the importance of careful planning and execution.

14. Alternatives to Multi-Club Ownership

There are alternatives to multi-club ownership that can offer similar benefits without the same risks.

14.1. Strategic Partnerships

Strategic partnerships between clubs can allow them to share resources and expertise without being owned by the same entity.

14.2. Loan Agreements

Loan agreements can enable clubs to develop young players by giving them opportunities to play at different levels and in different leagues.

14.3. Joint Ventures

Joint ventures can allow clubs to collaborate on specific projects, such as developing new stadiums or launching new marketing campaigns.

15. Conclusion: The Future of Football Club Ownership

The question “Can You Own Two Football Clubs?” is increasingly relevant in today’s football landscape. While owning multiple clubs offers potential benefits, it also presents significant challenges and risks. As the world of football evolves, understanding these complexities is crucial for owners, fans, and regulatory bodies alike.

Navigating the complexities of football club ownership can be daunting. At CAUHOI2025.UK.COM, we provide clear, reliable answers to your pressing questions. Whether you’re curious about sports investment, ownership regulations, or the future of football, our platform offers expert insights tailored for U.S. audiences. Explore CAUHOI2025.UK.COM today to discover more valuable information.

CAUHOI2025.UK.COM – Your trusted source for answers.

Equitable Life Building, 120 Broadway, New York, NY 10004, USA. For further assistance, please visit our website or contact us.

FAQ: Multi-Club Ownership

  1. Is it legal to own two football clubs?
    • It depends on the country. Owning clubs in the same country is often restricted, but owning clubs in different countries is generally permitted.
  2. Why do owners want to own multiple clubs?
    • Reasons include diversifying investments, expanding their brand, facilitating player transfers, and sportswashing.
  3. What are the risks of multi-club ownership?
    • Risks include conflicts of interest, financial instability for smaller clubs, and potential reputational damage.
  4. Does UEFA allow multi-club ownership?
    • UEFA has rules in place to prevent conflicts of interest but may allow ownership with non-decisive influence.
  5. What is a feeder club?
    • A feeder club is a smaller club whose ambitions are tempered to benefit a larger, parent club.
  6. How does Financial Fair Play affect multi-club ownership?
    • FFP regulations can limit owners’ ability to inject unlimited funds and scrutinize related-party transactions.
  7. What are the benefits for smaller clubs under multi-club ownership?
    • Benefits include access to resources, expertise, and player development opportunities.
  8. How do fans feel about multi-club ownership?
    • Fan opinions vary; some worry about loss of identity, while others appreciate financial stability.
  9. What are some examples of successful multi-club ownership models?
    • Examples include City Football Group and Red Bull.
  10. Where can I learn more about football club ownership?
    • Visit CauHoi2025.UK.COM for more information and insights.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *